I use MSRs, but Tubbs definitely seem to make a respectable snowshoe too. In terms of improving snowshoe design for the future, it would seem like a good strategy would be to reduce the amount of parts/components in the snowshoe. The more the snowshoe is a whole unit with less intricate parts, the less stuff there is to break.
For example, snowmobiles.
Today's snowmobiles have so much stuff that can break on them and zillions of parts, it's ridiculous.
I always rode a 1987 Yamaha XLV 540 and it never once broke down. Ever. It was almost indestructible. There were like 5 parts to the entire thing (I'm exaggerating but it was so simple that even I could work on it).
So in my view, less intricate parts = less that can break, fall off, and go wrong.
My all-time favorite snowshoes (not for deep powder though) are MSR Evo's. They epitomize what I am talking about. They have few intricate parts and not a lot of things that can break and go wrong. They are extremely tough. I bushwhacked Sentinel Mountain in the winter with these and beat the hell out of them on this trip and they made it without breaking.
For example, snowmobiles.
Today's snowmobiles have so much stuff that can break on them and zillions of parts, it's ridiculous.
I always rode a 1987 Yamaha XLV 540 and it never once broke down. Ever. It was almost indestructible. There were like 5 parts to the entire thing (I'm exaggerating but it was so simple that even I could work on it).
So in my view, less intricate parts = less that can break, fall off, and go wrong.
My all-time favorite snowshoes (not for deep powder though) are MSR Evo's. They epitomize what I am talking about. They have few intricate parts and not a lot of things that can break and go wrong. They are extremely tough. I bushwhacked Sentinel Mountain in the winter with these and beat the hell out of them on this trip and they made it without breaking.
Comment